Prime Minister Surayud Chulanont has brought Thailand back from the brink of another dangerously slippery slope. His decision to put a proposal to impose a state of emergency on hold could prove crucial for the political survival of the interim leadership - his own government and the Council for National Security (CNS). Some may say it has done little to boost his image and improve the overall situation, but Surayud undeniably has demonstrated good faith and consideration for the state of the country. And he has done it knowing that his relationship with the CNS could grow more estranged.
The interim leaders and their supporters are being given a taste of their own medicine. To declare a state of emergency would mock the ongoing campaign against ousted leader Thaksin Shinawatra, but that is the smallest of the problems it would present. Such a drastic measure would darken the already gloomy political atmosphere and compound the economic misery generated by the country's crisis. Doubts would grow, locally and abroad, over the motives of the interim leaders. Moreover, nobody could be certain if increased military power to cope with simmering dissent would make things better or worse.
Rumour has it that the CNS seriously wanted to impose a state of emergency, citing the nature of the anti-coup protests that brought together supporters of Thaksin as well as activists and villagers who regard the September 19 military takeover as a major setback for democracy. The protests have seen some elements directing fierce political attacks against Privy Council President General Prem Tinsulanonda. The CNS, it is said, has become worried that the relentless assaults on Prem's character could snowball into a major confrontation. There has also been concern that anti-coup elements, if allowed to gain a more solid foothold, could be transformed into a large-scale campaign against the new charter draft.
From The Nation
Blog master said... The coup maker conflict with Junta in this case. the coup maker want Junta to impose a state of emergency. In Thailand , almost people don't care about it but investers worry about that. The people may be confuse about Prem's involvement in 19 coup. What happen ? They've never herd before. But in Thai political website , they criticized Gen.Prem behavior for long time , But ordinary people didn't know. All Thai media can't talk about him, He's The untouchable man. Also, I heard the femel journalist told that "Stop !! Don't touch him Otherwise go to hell". I don't understand , we can criticize this man , its not lese majeste, he's not royal family. I think this case may be bring situation to confrontation.
1 comment:
People’s Alliance for Democracy (PAD)
Letter to His Excellency Mr. Quinton Mark Quayle, United Kingdom Ambassador to Thailand on the extradition of Thaksin and Pojamarn Shinawatra
October 30, 2008
His Excellency Quinton Mark Quayle
Ambassador of the United Kingdom
Thailand, Bangkok, British Embassy
14 Wireless Road
Lumpini, Pathumwan
Bangkok 10330
We, the People’s Alliance for Democracy, believe your government will be making a grave mistake by allowing former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra and his wife, Pojamarn Shinawatra, asylum in the United Kingdom. We ask that you forward this letter to Prime Minister Gordon Brown and Members of Parliament in the UK and consider your decision carefully.
Ex-Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra claims the charges against him are unfounded and politically motivated by “enemies of democracy”.
In a landmark ruling on October 21, 2008, he was found to have violated conflicts of interest rules in helping his wife Khunying Pojamam Shinawatra buy land from a state agency at one third the market price and sentenced to two years in jail. According to the Thai Supreme Court’s Criminal Division for Political Office Holders, Thaksin was found guilty of breaching Article 100 of the National Counter Corruption Act by aiding his wife in 2003 while he was still Prime Minister.
The court stated that as Thai Prime Minister, Thaksin had been entrusted to administer the state for the highest benefit of the state and the people, but instead chose to break the law. As the head of government, he should have set a good example, been honest, and behaved with good political ethics.
The Ratchapisek land ruling is the first in a series of cases against Thaksin Shinawatra. Other cases still pending in the Thai Supreme Court are abuse of power allegations linked to a two and three digit government lottery scheme, abuse of power related to irregularities in a 4 billion baht loan given by state controlled Export Import Bank of Thailand to the military government of Burma which alleged to have benefited his family business, and amending tax policies to enrich his business empire (Shin Corporation), as well as concealing assets.
In addition, on July 31, 2008 the Criminal Court sentenced Pojamarn Shinawatra to 3 years in prison for tax evasion over a 546 million baht transaction, and falsifying statements, and the same for her adopted brother, and her secretary with no probation. In its reading, the court reprimanded her, saying that with her high economic, social, and political status - as wife of the prime minister - she should have acted as a role model for society.
Thaksin has claimed in his bid for asylum that he cannot receive a fair trial in Thailand, yet in June 2008, the Thai Supreme Court sentenced three lawyers working for him to a six-month jail term for trying to bribe a C-7 court official by presenting the official with a snack box containing two million baht. But at the same time, his lawyers are petitioning Thai Courts in several other cases while he claims the Thai Courts are unfair.
Thaksin claims the people fighting against him do not believe in democracy, yet in May 2007 his Thai Rak Thai party was dissolved due to violating electoral laws (vote buying). 111 of the party’s executives including Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra were barred from voting and holding public office for five years. Even after his party was dissolved, things are, however, much more complicated.
For instance, the People's Power Party, which is Thaksin's Thai Rak Thai party in a new guise, came close to controlling the majority in the House of Representatives and won the right to set up a new government, but not without controversy. People’s Power Party party executive and House Speaker Yongyuth Tiyapairat was found guilty of electoral fraud. Mr. Yongyuth was caught on video tape paying local village leaders 20,000 baht each to influence them in voting and canvassing for votes in their regions.
His brother-in-law is now the Prime Minister. His close allies occupy key government and bureaucratic positions and control key businesses. He is still one of Thailand’s richest and most powerful person. However, he still claims that the “priveliged elite” is set to destroy him. In reality, it is he who is a leading member of the "various groups of privilege elites" that quite literally control Thailand.
Thailand and Great Britain have long enjoyed close and longstanding relations at all levels and in all aspects. Our two countries should not allow an individual to test the strength of our partnership. More importantly, the British Government should not exchange its broader national interests and opportunities to expand its cooperation with Thailand for Thaksin.
Thaksin Shinawatra must thus be brought back to Thailand not simply to face the Supreme Court's ruling but also, and more importantly, to help secure the future of justice in the country. A wrong decision on the part of the British government and judiciary system will help make the functioning of justice in Thailand difficult.
We, the People’s Alliance for Democracy, call for the extradition of Thaksin and Pojamarn Shinawatra from the United Kingdom in order to face the guilty verdict and serve time in prison and appear in court for the other charges against them.
Expel them from the UK and return these fugitives to Thailand.
The People’s Alliance for Democracy
Copied and distributed by thummachon
thummachon@hotmail.com
Post a Comment